Who Goes There?!

So, the latest stray dog that everyone has been kicking is Laurie Gough’s misguided screed on The Huffington Post assaulting the idea of self-publishing. Now, it would be easy, so, so easy to join the dog-piling and point out things like Kiwi having a higher rank than any of her books, or point out that from all reports, while they might not be from a Vanity press, they are chock full of vanity. Or even the point that she’s writing for free for HuffPo. I mean, when both Larry Correia AND the readers at File770 are taking your article apart, you know you’re on the wrong track. (I don’t think anyone needs links from me to find these).

But I would like to address the main thesis of her piece, the idea that Publishing Industry Gatekeepers are the key to quality and that Self-publishing lacks them, therefore it is all crap (“An insult to the written word” in her terms). Now the easiest way to counter a universal claim like that is to pick out counterexamples. That’s already been done.

No, my point is that she is wrong about the lack of gatekeepers. There are actually more gatekeepers now than there are editors and publishers and agents in the entire publishing industry.

I’m talking about you, the reader – both individually and collectively. Individually, because you now have a vastly broader range of works to choose from. You are no longer constrained by the biases of a publisher and his marketing department telling him “Urban Fantasy is over,” when you still want to read about the corner bodega with the dragon instead of a cat. And collectively, through your actions on a site like Amazon. When you and all the other readers go to Amazon, you are informing each other about what is good or bad by what you buy, or not, as reflected by the Amazon ranking (conveniently divided by subgenre), and what else is good through the “Also Bought” mechanism. And individually, again, through your star ratings and reviews. Your actions are both informed by those who have gone before you, and they guide those who come after you.

Through this mechanism, the whole gatekeeping function has been crowdsourced, and the sheer number of people involved cancels out individual bias. Or rather, that bias has been channeled into more relevant recommendations.

But wait, there’s more. There are independent reviewers, people with their own blogs who help sort through what’s good, whether by trying to point out the Emperor’s truant trousseau, or daring the murky depths to bring up an overlooked pearl. Similarly, through reviews and reading lists posted to Goodreads, the internet has made word of mouth a primary source these days. Do you want to know if the latest Star Wars movie is worth seeing? Check FaceBook or Twitter or Gab (If you’re lucky enough to have gotten an account yet). And the best thing is, even though there are millions of people out there with differing opinions, chances are you’re already listening to the opinions of people you trust, who see things similarly to you. Whether it’s Larry Correia posting a “Book Bomb” or File 770 rounding up links to new books, you more than likely have already found a source of recommendations you are likely to follow.

True, Amazon and the Kindle have basically taken the slushpile and put it online, but you don’t have to go through it yourself, everybody else has already done it for you. And your reading choices are not being filtered by a bored, underpaid English Lit grad in a cramped New York office who is pining for the days of making lattés at Starbucks, who is the TRUE  Publishing Industry Gatekeeper, long before the Editor in Chief sees a word.

Advertisements

16 thoughts on “Who Goes There?!

  1. Oh, yay … another self-anointed expert taking another thwack at a long-defunct equine carcass, for about the five-millionth time since about 2008.

    Yeah the trad-pubs are chock-full of quality, and the indies are dreck because of trad-pub gatekeepers. Got it, sugar. Wake me up in time for your next brilliant insight that hasn’t been said about five million times since 2008.

        • Someone who isn’t preening about how important he is because the gatekeepers approved of him.

          And stop playing, silly troll. If you’ve heard of her, it’s probably because you’re related or went to school with her. No one is impressed.

        • Happy to oblige: I’m a writer, editor, and (retired) publisher. I’ve been professionally published since 1974, in both fiction and nonfiction, and writing for longer than Laurie Gough has been alive. I was EIC of two glossy trade journals, one of them with over 200,000 subscribers. There are half a million books in the world with my name on them, including a computer science textbook that’s been in print for 28 years. I co-founded and ran editorial for a firm that became Arizona’s largest book publisher. When I self-published my first novel in 2015, I made more money in three weeks than I’d made on my traditionally published fiction since 1974.

          Hope this helps.

  2. Quote: And your reading choices are not being filtered by a bored, underpaid English Lit grad in a cramped New York office who is pining for the days of making lattés at Starbucks, who is the TRUE Publishing Industry Gatekeeper, long before the Editor in Chief sees a word.

    Ain’t that the truth!

  3. “And your reading choices are not being filtered by a bored, underpaid English Lit grad in a cramped New York office…”

    Exactly. And the fact that indie is murdering tradpub shows that readers are much better at setting their own reading preferences than editorial interns tasked with making those choices for them.

  4. Speaking of putting the slush pile on-line, someone once asked Bennet Cerf (former editor -in-chief at Random House) why he still looked through the slush pile. He replied, “‘Cry, the Beloved Country’,” a Random House best-seller (and a classic) that had come in through the transom.

    Yes, Sturgeon’s Law (“Ninety percent of anything is crap”) applies to self-published work. (Having self-published myself, I should know!) But there are gems out there as well. Self-publishing offers an opportunity to authors who, like Alan Paton, are unable or unwilling to do do the self-promotional fan-dance needed to attract the attention of an agent or publisher. And, unlike the vanity presses of the past, does so with minimal financial risk to the author.

    More freedom! More opportunity! More choice! Small wonder the Left hates self-publishing.

    • Yup, the big hurdle now is reaching the readers, but as I point out above, the internet makes Word of Mouth a force to be reckoned with.

      (and technically, Sturgeon was reputed to be a very polite fellow, and said “crud” not “crap.”)

  5. I have a question, doctor.

    How long were you looking for the opportunity to use the phrase “the Emperor’s truant trousseau” in a post?

    Tell the truth, now. We gatekeepers need to know. ;>)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s